"Hornet Flight," by Ken Follett

“Hornet Flight,” by Ken Follett, (New York: Penguin Putnam Inc.; 2002), 420 pages.

The Second World War is the backdrop to many works of fiction. Some books take us to the center of the action at the front lines, while others take us the machinations of high command. “Hornet Flight” takes us to occupied Denmark at the beginning of the Nazi occupation, and provides the reader a mixture of frontline action and central command politics. The exact time in which this story is based is significant because during this time Danish citizens decided whether their loyalties were with their Nazi occupiers, or with their desire for freedom and the emerging Danish resistance movement. The dichotomy, or moral and ethical choice between good and evil drives this story, and sets up the narrative's major theme, namely the struggle between men on whether to live their lives on the side of good, or to live their lives on the side of evil.

Follett places these issues firmly in the minds of his characters as they are confronted with a growing realization that their Nazi occupiers are capable of immense cruelty, terror and wickedness. In the center of this morality fight are two extended Danish families, one is the family of a church pastor, another their long-time family rival. The pastor’s family become sympathetic to the fledgling Danish resistance, and through a series of actions of helping out friends and family, makes themselves enemies of the Nazi occupiers. Their rival family, especially one member with a strong grudge against them, is sympathetic to the Nazi's and seeks their favors, ingratiates himself with them and becomes their lackey. His persecution of suspected spies and suspected resistance members brings him into conflict with his old family rivals, whom he mercilessly hunts down, especially when he suspects them of having discovered a secret Nazi weapon. The pastor's family becomes instrumental in obtaining intelligence information and photos that must be sent to London by a certain date to ensure the greater success of the allied aerial bombing of Germany.

Follett is a masterful storyteller who tells big stories through the lives of individuals. Although this is fiction, Follett tells the important part played by resistance fighters and spies in helping secure information vital to the long-term success of the allied bombing effort. With this skill in entwining the lives of everyday people with actual events, Follett tells a fabulous story that both entertains the reader and provides hours of enjoyment. Don't think this is a war novel - its not. The war is a backdrop, but the real story is the drama of everyday life including betrayal, love, violence, loyalty, dedication to duty, dedication to family, and the issues we face everyday, particularly, what to do in life when given a choice between the easy and ignoble path, or the difficult and right path in life. If these are the things that interest you in novels, then this is a book that you will enjoy.

"Travels With Charley," by John Steinbeck

“Travels With Charley: In Search of America,” by John Steinbeck, (New York: The Viking Press 1962, Penguin Books edition 1980), 210 pages.

Steinbeck’s “Travels With Charley” is his non-fiction account of his 1960 driving journey around the United States. His choice of vehicle was a pick-up truck with an attached camper. His sole companion was his pet poodle, Charley; hence the title "Travels with Charley." The journey began after Labor Day from Steinbeck's home on Long Island in the state of New York. After some excitement negotiating the tempestuous conflagrations from a passing hurricane, Steinbeck commenced his journey into New England. After an exploration of Maine, he turned west and headed for the west coast, breaking his journey at towns small and large including the more notable ones of Chicago (where he was visited by his wife), Minneapolis/St. Paul, and finally Seattle. He journeyed down the coast to San Francisco and visited his old home town of Monterey, and then drove to West Texas, New Orleans, and eventually back to New York.

Steinbeck's journey was neither leisurely, nor exploratory. He appeared to be in a hurry compared to the other more contemporary books of this genre, such as William Least Heat Moon's "Blue Highways" and Bill Bryson's "The Lost Continent" to name only a few. Nonetheless, this short odyssey provided Steinbeck with the opportunity to record his plentitude of observations about the American landscape, the people he met on his journey, and the opportunity to reflect on life in America. It was these conversations and observations that coalesced to enable Steinbeck to give his views on the country of his birth, a country in which he had not resided in for over 25 years, a country that he wanted to rediscover. His interest in rediscovery grew from is realization that he knew so little of contemporary life in America. His memories were from long ago, of an era long past, so to write about America in 1960, he had to go and see it for himself. The things he saw delighted, surprised and disturbed him. Such were the impacts that he seemed at times troubled by what he sees, and is at times dour and dire in his conclusions. He appeared to think that the wholesome certainty of the America of his youth had been replaced by a slick derivative cliché of its former self, a place devoid of higher culture more notable for fast living and ordinary food (except for breakfast).

One could argue for pages about whether Steinbeck was right; some have even argued that this book contains many fabrications or exaggerations. If you set aside these issues, it is hard to deny that "Travels With Charley" is a serious and well written book by one of America's finest writers. It is a glimpse into the mind of a man in the later years of his life reflecting on the changes to his country in his lifetime. He saw a lot of things he didn't like. There are no stupendous outbursts of excitement, or side-splitting accounts or bawdy tales. Humor, excitement and spiritedness seem to have evaporated from his pen. This book is not uplifting, but is a sober, melancholic, reflective and moody reflection on America in 1960. As we read it today, it is a journey into the past, but for Steinbeck, it’s a contemplation on his changed country, a cautionary speculation on the future of a country that he loved and whose future he fears for. It is a fine example of non-fiction writing by one the America's finest writers. For these reasons, it should be compulsory reading for all with more than a passing interest in American life.