David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell

Malcolm Gladwell, David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants (New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2013), 305 pages.

The Malcolm Gladwell publishing enterprise’s latest installment is David and Goliath. The format is similar to his previous efforts: a volume of essays with a theme. This volume is about what happens when ordinary people are confronted by giants. By giants, he means powerful opponents of all kinds from armies and mighty warriors to physical and intellectual disability, misfortune, and oppression. Each chapter tells the story of a person that faced an oversized challenge and was forced to choose to respond. Each person Gladwell covers was challenged to play by the rules or give up, strike back, or forgive. In exploring these stories, Gladwell tries to explore two ideas. First, he explores the idea that lopsided conflicts, like that between David and Goliath, produce greatness and beauty. Second, he believes that we consistently get these kinds of David and Goliath conflicts wrong. To Gladwell, we misread them or misinterpret them. The same qualities that give one side great strength and an overwhelming advantage are often sources of great weakness. Being an underdog can change people in ways that we often fail to appreciate: it can open doors, create opportunities, educate and enlighten, and make possible what might otherwise have seemed un-thinkable.

Gladwell uses examples to make his case. For example, he examines a sporting team with a novice coach and novice players that achieve amazing success against more experienced opponents by using unorthodox tactics. Gladwell examines school class sizes and student family wealth to show the positive relationship between wealth up to a certain point, after which there is a negative relationship between wealth and success. Parents of college-age children will find the chapter of college achievement very interesting. Gladwell explored research into success rates of students interested in science in non-prestigious colleges versus achievement of similar children at prestigious colleges. Gladwell reported that on average, it is better to be a big fish (bright kid) in a small pond (non-prestigious college) than it is to be a small fish in a large pond (a bright kid among very many bright kids at a large prestigious college). Gladwell also examined research into the productivity of faculty that graduated from non-prestigious colleges versus faculty that graduated from prestigious colleges and found that the faculty that graduated from less prestigious colleges were more productive (on average) than graduates of prestigious schools. Gladwell also examines how people that face great difficulties and sufferings often develop great skills and accomplishments in spite of these difficulties. The book contains three chapters on the limits to power, namely, how great power can act to sew the seeds of its own defeat, or result in tan expensive and fruitless use of power by the State.

While very readable, and at time quite engaging, Gladwell’s latest book lacks the gravity, punch or impact of his earlier works. It’s adequately entertaining enough for this reader to finish it, but only just. This is a book I looked forward to finishing: it started well, but faded badly. It starts well with what you would expect in a book with this title, but after the first third, starts to fade to the extent that it is not readily apparent how the final third fits the author’s purpose. Perhaps this is due to our interest in stories about David’s success, rather than Goliath-type failures. No book is perfect. Galdwell has written a book worth reading with brief moments of great insight, but overall, somewhat disappointing compared to his other works.